# Ultimate Tip Resistance of Piles

**Courses > Foundation Analysis and Design > Bearing Capacity of Piles (Deep Foundations) > Ultimate Tip Resistance of Piles**

### Introduction

A deep foundation is a type of foundation which transfers building loads to the earth farther down from the surface than a shallow foundation does, to a subsurface layer or a range of depths.

A pile is typically a vertical structural element of a deep foundation, driven or drilled deep into the ground at the building site.

Ultimate bearing capacity of piles is the sum of its skin resistance and tip resistance:

where Q_{ tip,ult} = tip resistance; Q_{sL} = skin resistance; q_{tip-ult} = bearing stress; A_{b} = area of pile tip; q_{si} = skin friction of i^{th }layer; A_{si} = skin area in contact with i^{th} layer;

### Concepts and Formulas

For the methods shown, with the exception of Brinch Hansen’s method and Kulhawy et al. (1983), the capacity resulting from the frictional term (Ngamma term) is assumed to be negligible in comparison to capacity resulting from the cohesional (Nc) and surcharge/embedment terms (Nq terms). However, this assumption is not always valid, especially for short, large diameter piles such as drilled shafts. If you want to include the frictional term, it is recommended that you use Brinch Hansen's method:

Alternately you could use Kulhawy et al. (1983) as discussed later. For PHI = 0 analyses, this frictional term is zero.

#### Brinch Hansen's Method:

Brinch Hansen's method, as described in shallow foundations, is applicable to both shallow and deep foundations.

#### Janbu's Method:

where

where e = base of the natural logarithm; and

"Psi" must be estimated using judgment. Janbu (1976) indicated that "Psi" varies from about 60° for soft soils to about 105° for dense soils

It should also be pointed out that Janbu derived this equation for plane-strain conditions so that it would be appropriate to multiply the calculated value of q_{tip,ult} by an appropriate shape factor. Bowles (1996) indicates that a shape factor of 1.3 may be used, but other shape factors (e.g. Brinch Hansen, Meyerhof, etc.) could be used. Judgment must be exercised when selecting a shape factor to apply to Janbu’s equation, especially if the strength parameters for the soil include c in addition to PHI.

#### Vesic's Method:

where

Methods to estimage I_{rr}:

1- Estimate I_{r} based on friction ration (Fr) from CPT test using an electric cone:

2- Typical values of I_{r} for sand and silt are as follows:

- Sand: 75 to 100
- Silt: 50 to 75

3- Estimate E, v, and e_{vol}. Some typical ways are as follows:

where P_{A} = atmospheric pressure; and

- m = 100 to 200 for loose granular soil
- m = 200 to 500 for medium dense soil
- m = 500 to 1000 for dense soil

#### Direct Estimates from In Situ Tests:

**CPT: **The following information is from Kulhawy et al. (1983, pp. 8-22 to 8-23). CPT results should be reasonably reliable because the cone is basically a small diameter deep foundation. The correlations have shown, for tip resistance:

The lower range of q_{c} values measured in the field should be used in this equation.

**SPT: **SPT blowcounts have also been used frequently. However, the test procedure does not replicate the actual loading of a deep foundation. Still, a useful correlation for the tip resistance of driven piles is:

where:

### Watch Videos

### Solved sample problems

### Download Files

No files available for this topic. Suggest one!

### Read also

- Shaft Resistance of Piles
- Solved Example: Analysis of a one-way spanning unreinforced masonry wall panel (BS 5628)
- Top software for Geotechnical Engineers
- Everything about sheet-pile walls: types, materials and construction methods
- Solved Example: Design of a load-bearing brick (unreinforced masonry) wall (BS 5628)

### Share

**Follow our official Facebook page (@civilengineeringbible) and Twitter page (@CivilEngBible) and do not miss the best civil engineering tools and articles!**